IP Lawyers

Chiacchio IP, LLC is a results-oriented law firm focused solely on helping its clients achieve their intellectual property-related objectives and solve any intellectual property issues they may be grappling with. Chiacchio IP, LLC partners with its clients to help them make informed decisions regarding intellectual property-related matters. Chiacchio IP, LLC understands the high stakes involved where intellectual property is at issue; and how we go about handling such matters reflects this understanding. After even a brief period of time working together, our clients become at ease that their matter is receiving the highest level of attention and care. Chiacchio IP, LLC believes that expertise in intellectual property law combined with dedication to client service is the recipe for achieving clients’ goals and meeting clients’ expectations.

Intellectual Property Overview

Intellectual property refers to property rights in intangible assets that are the product of human ingenuity, as compared to tangible personal property or land (the legal term for which is “real property”). The rationale for government recognition of intellectual property rights is to incentivize innovation by creating the opportunity for intellectual property owners to realize the financial fruits of their innovation. There are four types of intellectual property protection: patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. In some instances, more than one of these forms of intellectual property protection may be available and desirable. Each of these forms of intellectual property is discussed further below. Chiacchio IP, LLC provides the full range of services relevant to each form of intellectual property protection.


A patent is a federal government-approved monopoly that provides exclusive rights to practice an invention in the U.S. for a limited period of time (20 years from filing of the application). Patents provide critical economic incentive for innovation. Patents consist of a specification, drawings (where necessary to understand the invention), and claims. The “specification” must contain a detailed description of the invention and must specifically describe the advance over what was previously known. Drawings, while not, strictly speaking, necessary in all instances, are very helpful to ensure that the invention is fully and adequately described. Every patent must contain at least one claim. A claim is a sentence, appearing at the end of the patent, after the specification, precisely defining exactly what the invention is, legally speaking. Further, the claims must be adequately supported by the specification. This requires that the description of the invention set forth in the specification enables a person possessing an ordinary level of skill in the pertinent field to make and use in the invention without having to engage in undue experimentation.

Patents are not self-executing (though simply possessing the patent may have some deterrent effect with regard to would-be infringers). Accordingly, much of a patent’s value depends upon the ability and willingness (both actual and perceived) of the patent owner to enforce the patent rights if necessary. Enforcement in this regard refers to initiating a patent infringement lawsuit in U.S. federal district court. While a full patent infringement litigation can be costly, most such actions settle prior to going to trial. As part of that settlement, the accused infringer may take a license under the asserted patent(s). Another consideration to bear in mind, however, when deciding whether or not to initiate a patent infringement lawsuit, is that, in the vast majority of cases, the accused infringer will challenge the validity of the asserted patent(s). Such validity challenges may be based upon, among other grounds, an argument that the patent should not have issued because it is not new, or while new would nonetheless have been obvious, or that the invention is not adequately described by the specification. Many patents that are asserted in litigation are held to be invalid. It, therefore, very much behooves patent applicants to take steps to help ensure that they are obtaining the strongest possible patent up-front.

The Chicago IP attorneys at Chiacchio IP, LLC have substantial experience handling the following sorts of matters relating to patents:

  • Preparing and prosecuting U.S. patent applications (and coordinating with foreign counsel where the client wishes to procure patent protection in foreign jurisdictions as well). Ted has recently prepared and/or prosecuted patent applications relating to several different mechanical technologies, electrical technology, and artificial intelligence.
  • Preparing formal Opinion Letters, and otherwise advising clients, regarding issues such as patentability, patent validity, patent infringement, patent enforceability, and freedom to operate.
  • Preparing patent landscape analyses.
  • Preparing cease-and-desist letters and responses to such letters.
  • Patent infringement litigation. Mr. Chiacchio has litigated patent infringement actions throughout most of his career. He has been actively involved with five patent infringement trials in U.S. federal district court. He has extensive experience in all aspects of patent infringement litigation. Mr. Chiacchio has extensive experience on the front lines securing favorable results in a number of high-stakes patent cases with hundreds of millions of dollars in sales at stake. Such actions have related to pharmaceutical technologies as well as computer software-related technologies.
  • Preparing and negotiating licenses of patent rights.
  • Analyzing employment agreements that include provisions concerning patent ownership.
  • Conducting due diligence investigations in advance of potential corporate mergers and acquisitions.
  • Partnering with clients to monetize their patents.
  • Challenging the validity of patents before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and defending against such challenges.

A trademark is a word or symbol that serves as a unique identifier of a source of goods or services. Trademark protection is critical in business because it protects against competitors improperly benefiting from a business’ goodwill in the marketplace and strong business reputation.

Trademark rights result from one’s being the first to use a mark in commerce. Federal registration is not a prerequisite to obtaining trademark rights in the U.S. There are, however, benefits to federal trademark registration. Where a trademark is registered on the Principal Register maintained by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, these benefits include, among others, providing constructive notice to the public, including would-be infringers, of one’s trademark ownership claim; entitlement to a presumption of ownership of the trademark and to the exclusive right to use the mark nationwide; and inclusion in the federal trademark database, which will be searched by the trademark examiner when deciding whether to allow others’ trademark applications.

Where a party chooses to file a trademark infringement action to enforce their trademark rights, they will need to establish a likelihood of consumer confusion as between the trademarks at issue. Opposition proceedings are administrative proceedings presided over by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and may be initiated by those seeking to have a pending trademark application rejected (for example, based on likelihood of confusion with another mark). Cancellation proceedings are very similar to opposition proceedings procedurally but involve requests to cancel the federal registration of already-registered trademarks. While the recourse available to a party initiating an opposition or cancellation proceeding is limited to rejection or cancellation of the trademark application/registered trademark, much broader potential recourse is available in litigation in the courts. Courts have the authority to award monetary damages as well as an injunction preventing continued use of a mark.

Chiacchio IP, LLC frequently handles the following matters relating to trademarks:

  • Preparing and prosecuting trademark applications.
  • Advising clients concerning matters relating to likelihood of confusion between trademarks, priority of trademark use, the strength or weakness of particular trademarks, dilution of famous trademarks, and false advertising,
  • Preparing cease-and-desist letters and responses to cease-and-desist letters.
  • Opposition and cancellation proceedings on behalf of both trademark applicants/registrants and petitioners pursuing rejection or cancelation of an application/registered trademark.
  • Trademark infringement litigation in the federal courts. Mr. Chiacchio currently serves as lead trial counsel in a trademark battle involving parallel opposition proceedings before the TTAB and litigation in federal district court. Mr. Chiacchio recently successfully settled a trademark dispute on behalf of the trademark owner wherein the settlement provided for the applicant/defendant withdrawing their trademark application and rebranding.

With regard to the distinct but related area of law concerning rights to one’s name and likeness, Mr. Chiacchio has significant experience counseling clients regarding such matters and preparing cease-and-desist letter addressing such matters.


Copyright protects original, creative, expressive content that has been fixed in a tangible form. The categories of work eligible for copyright protection include, generally, the following: literary works; musical works; dramatic works; pantomimes and choreographic works; pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; motion pictures and other audiovisual works; sound recordings; and architectural plans. Copyright owners possess the exclusive right to reproduce/copy the work, to distribute the work publicly, to publicly display the work, to prepare derivative works, to perform the work publicly (where applicable), and to publicly perform sound recordings of the work through digital audio transmissions (where applicable).

Chiacchio IP, LLC routinely handles the following matters relating to copyright for its clients:

  • Securing copyright registrations from the U.S. Copyright Office.
  • Drafting and negotiating copyright licenses.
  • Advising clients concerning matters such as copyrightability, copyright ownership, implied non-exclusive copyright licenses, copyright infringement and related strategy matters, work-for-hire provisions in employment agreements (or lack thereof), and authorship.
  • Litigating copyright disputes in the federal courts. Mr. Chiacchio currently serves as lead trial counsel for a successful author in her action in U.S. federal district court against former colleagues that, among other things, seeks to establish authorship and copyright ownership of six culinary-related manuscripts. Mr. Chiacchio recently prevailed in securing dismissal of a fraud counterclaim asserted against his client in response to the client’s assertion of her copyright ownership rights.
Trade Secrets

Where highly sensitive information/technology is involved, careful consideration is required regarding the pros and cons of pursuing trade secret protection versus other forms of intellectual property protection, patent protection in particular. These two forms of intellectual property protection are mutually exclusive because in order to obtain a patent, one must disclose their invention to the public (i.e., in the patent itself); while trade secret protection requires that the trade secret not be disclosed.

More specifically with regard to trade secrets, the following three elements are required in order for information to qualify as a trade secret:

  1. The information is not generally known and not reasonably ascertainable;
  2. Steps are taken to maintain such secrecy; and
  3. The information possesses economic value that derives from the secrecy.

Trade secrets may take the form of a formula, practice, process, design, instrument, pattern, commercial method, or compilation of information. As long as appropriate steps are taken to maintain the secrecy of such information, trade secret protection may extend indefinitely. Further, aside from measures such as non-disclosure/non-dissemination agreements and security precautions to preserve the confidentiality of the trade secret, obtaining trade secret protection does not entail any independent costs. Rather, if the criteria referenced above are met, such information will be deemed a protectable trade secret.

Notwithstanding these benefits to trade secret protection, there are drawbacks as well. The drawbacks include that there is no recourse under trade secret law for reverse engineering by others or if someone else independently develops the same trade secret. For these reasons, there is no such thing as a trade secret infringement claim (as provided for under patent, copyright, and trademark law). Rather, the only enforcement mechanism for trade secrets is a claim for misappropriation (i.e., theft) of the trade secret where possession was obtained improperly.

The Chicago IP lawyers at Chiacchio IP, LLC regularly render the following services relating to trade secrets:

  • Advising concerning measures that should be taken to help preserve the confidentiality of trade secret information that are specific to each client’s operations, industry, and infrastructure.
  • Analyzing and advising regarding employment agreements that include provisions concerning trade secret ownership.
  • Advising regarding the pros and cons of electing trade secret protection relative to patent or copyright protection.
  • Advising regarding steps to take when one’s trade secrets have been misappropriated.
  • Preparing demand letters addressing alleged trade secret misappropriation and responses to demand letters.
  • Litigating trade secret misappropriation and related matters. Mr. Chiacchio currently serves as lead trial counsel in a litigation pending in federal district court asserting trade secret misappropriation claims under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act as well as under Illinois state law; and a claim for alleged hacking brought pursuant to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Technical Expertise

Over the course of over 15 years of practicing intellectual property law, Chiacchio IP’s founder Theodore J. Chiacchio (“Ted”) has developed a diverse set of technical competencies. Such technical competencies have been developed through his spending thousands of hours entrenched in the technology at issue in the matters that he has handled and working extensively with inventors and world-class experts in the technological fields involved. Ted’s technical competence encompasses, among other fields, mechanical, Life Sciences (medical, pharmaceutical, chemistry, biology, biochemistry), computer hardware and software, LED lighting, sensor/tracking technology, digital media networks, heating systems, and machine learning visualization platforms. Ted also has significant experience handling matters involving business method patents.

Cost-Effectiveness Without Sacrificing Quality

Chiacchio IP, LLC makes an effort to keep overhead expenses low. This is why we are in a position to provide cost-effectiveness that large law firms simply cannot (or will not) provide. Critically, however, the quality of service is on-par with (or, in most cases, superior to) that which you will get with any firm. Ted began his career by gaining years of comprehensive training and experience with two top international law firms. Ted, more recently, practiced for just short of a decade with a law firm that is consistently ranked by multiple publications as a Tier 1 (nationally) intellectual property law firm (a classification that includes less than 10 firms). This combination of low overhead and top-tier training and experience allows for an immense value-add for clients.

Chiacchio IP, LLC offers customized billing options for all of its clients. While certain clients choose a traditional hourly-based billing model, many others prefer project-based, flat fee billing options. Ted appreciates that the certainty provided for by flat fee billing oftentimes can be an attractive option for many businesses and individuals. Depending on the specific nuances of a particular matter, however, hourly billing may be a better option in certain instances (for example, where there is a high degree of uncertainty as to how a matter may unfold). For all matters, Ted strives to be efficient and provides detailed monthly statements setting forth all activity undertaken. Ted believes strongly that full transparency is a key tool for effective attorney-client communication.

Recent News
On June 10, 2022, in Harmonia Rosales, Inc. et al. v. Nitrogen Labs, Inc. et al., Chiacchio IP, LLC successfully defeated Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order in Illinois Chancery Court. Plaintiffs had sought a TRO prohibiting Defendants from redirecting a domain away from Plaintiffs' company website. In denying Plaintiffs' TRO Motion, the Court held that Plaintiffs had not established a clearly ascertainable right in need of protection with respect to their Promissory Estoppel claim, Equitable Estoppel claim, Malicious Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage claim, and Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act claim. June 10, 2022
On December 10, 2020, in U.S. District Court in Chicago, Theodore Chiacchio, serving as lead trial counsel on behalf of Nyman IP LLC, obtained for dietary supplement manufacturer and distributor North American Herb and Spice a permanent injunction halting further trademark infringement by defendant Andromeda. Theodore also secured an award of $75,000 for punitive damages under the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
North Am. Herb and Spice Co. Ltd. LLC v. Andromeda, Case No. 1:20-cv-1934 (MMR)(SIS) (N.D. Ill.)
December 10, 2020
Chiacchio IP, on behalf of the Firm's client, a highly successful dental practice located in Chicago, Chatham Dental Care, successfully defeated Humana Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Chatham Dental Care's commercial disparagement claim. The case is Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-0645, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. March 22, 2023
Theodore J. Chiacchio, serving as lead trial counsel (on behalf of Nyman IP), secures a favorable outcome for his client in a trademark battle involving parallel opposition proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and infringement litigation in federal district court, whereby defendant/applicant withdrew its trademark application and is rebranding.
Spirit Tea LLC v. Utopia Oriental, Inc., 2:19-cv-5337(DMG)(FFM)(C.D. Cal.)
October 25, 2019
Chiacchio IP, LLC earns dismissal of trademark infringement and counterfeiting lawsuit brought against the Firm's client, a Chinese on-line retailer.
Mister Twister, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 1:19-cv-5091 (HDL)(SRH)(N.D. Ill.)
September 10, 2019
Photo of Theodore J. Chiacchio
Theodore J. Chiacchio

Theodore J. Chiacchio is an experienced intellectual property attorney, having been practicing intellectual property law for over 15 years. Ted gained years of valuable training and experience working in the New York and Chicago offices...

Client Reviews
When I first started looking for a lawyer in the US, I had no idea what to expect. I represent an international online retailer from China and we were unfamiliar with the US legal system. An urgent legal message from the plaintiff regarding a trademark infringement case started my search for an experienced trademark lawyer. After calling and speaking to a wide variety of costly lawyers and law firms, I realized that Ted was one of the few personable, professional, and intelligent options that I came across during my search. Not only did he show me that he valued my time, but also my opinion and decisions regarding the case. If you are currently looking for an experienced trademark lawyer for your case, I strongly recommend you give Ted or his office a call and see what they can do for you. 老单
Ted is an outstanding Intellectual Property attorney that truly cares about his clients' needs. During one of the most stressful times of my life, Ted gave me the assurance and confidence that everything would be okay. His knowledge and expertise allowed us to find a swift and positive solution to my matter. As a lawyer myself, I can honestly say that Ted is a world-class attorney and I highly recommend him to anyone that has Intellectual Property needs. Blake Hall
I am a financial executive who has worked in the life sciences industry (pharma/biotech/med device) for over 15 years now. I have known Ted for over 20 years, during the course of which he has provided to me patent and other intellectual property-related advice. Ted has an extraordinary depth of patent law knowledge gained from many years of practicing at top tier corporate law firms. I find him to be incredibly thorough, thoughtful, practical and responsive and look forward to continuing to benefit from his capabilities and guidance in the future. Scott Kain
Working with Chiacchio IP was extremely easy and a great experience. Very knowledgeable and was able to help with my trademark matter in a responsive and timely manner. Highly recommend! Andrew Gilman, Owner, Northline Property Group
Theodore Chiacchio offered us exceptional help with our legal situation. He is extremely knowledgeable and responsive. It was apparent from our first conversation that he was right on track and knew exactly what to do to provide us with security and an outcome that was both fair and reasonable. We felt at ease and confident with Theodore. In what was a very difficult and unwanted situation he made much easier. Rebecca Cappelli, Owner, Songbird Studios Inc.
Bar Admissions and Professional Licenses
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
State of New York Court of Appeals
Seal of the Supreme Court State of Illinois
United States Patent & Trademark Office Department of Commerce
Seal of the Supreme Court of New Jersey
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Contact Us
  1. 1 Complimentary Consultation Available
  2. 2 Highly Responsive
  3. 3 Customized Billing Rates Available

Fill out the contact form or call us at (312) 815-2384 to schedule your consultation.

* Providing this Information Does Not Create an Attorney-client Relationship